Having read the posts above and the comment from a moderator, perhaps my post saying this is an obvious question deserves better than the poster Jim Carroll calling it trolling? To then read someone saying Mr Carroll has been attacked makes one wonder why.... His insistence that his view is fact rather than his view is bad enough, but letting him abuse others isn't the "best behaviour" the moderator seems to be wanting.

How he assumes someone who wishes to remain anonymous is the same person as any other anonymous person is beyond me. Prejudice? Possibly, but defending an absurd notion is more like it.

It ruins a decent thread. Mr Carroll, whoever he is, should be ashamed.