"I just responded to the accurate quote, ignoring the report name."
Twice actually - just checked
If you care to look, I pointedly asked you had you read "the Redmond Report" immediately prior to 'Guest' asking me for the link.
As I said - it doesn't matter - point made - "Wriggle, wriggle " as the man said.
You are now using this inconsequential point to avoid the real questions I put to you
1   Quotes from the Six Days war programme?
2   Who disputes Benny Morris?
3   Response to Sabra/Shatila facts
4   How do you know the 2014 massacres weren't massacres if nobody else does?
But first:
5   Do you really believe that The united Nations and all the Human Rights Groups are not to be trusted and the only ones to believe are politicians
"Put up any fact for response you like, but one at a time please."
Are you ****** serious??? - a man who reads tomes of 1000 pages can only handle facts one at a time!!
You have been given the exact facts - all carefully linked and verified - respond to them in any way you wish.
You really do have to be joking!!
The facts were not put up for you - you are not interested in facts.
They were put up for the record here - the only way you come into any of this is to expose you for the dishonest massacre denier that you are.
You don't bother to respond , fine by me - double whammy - they stand as what they are - facts, and you are exposed for what you are - must be my birthday again!!
When will you get it into your head that your ongoing behaviour has excluded you from ever being taken seriously again?
Jim Carroll