The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #158999   Message #3769105
Posted By: Jim Carroll
29-Jan-16 - 11:00 AM
Thread Name: BS: Terrorism, Again (Israel)
Subject: RE: BS: Terrorism, Again (Israel)
Israel is opposed to the court, is not a member and has no plans to cooperate with investigators already looking into possible crimes by both sides during fighting. It was furious when the Palestinians announced their application on Dec. 31 and tried to undermine it by lobbying to cut funding to the court.
The demands for closure were made when Palestine was accepted as a member.
It is opposed to the court's existence and has attempted to cut its funding.
As a non-member it has now power to openly demand the closure of the court but it has attempted to gets its friends to neutralise its work bu cutting its funding
"Now, however, in response to the ICC's launch of a preliminary investigation into alleged crimes in Palestinian territory, Israeli government officials have chosen to challenge the very existence of the court. Is Israel's campaign to delegitimate the ICC likely to advance its interests? Based on comparable campaigns by aggrieved states, the answer is almost certainly no."
Israel attempts to challenge existence if ICC
Don't you dare call me a liar - your whole case is based on lies.
"You are so gullible!"
You have had the evidence and produced none yourself

"
Subject: RE: BS: Terrorism, Again (Israel)
From: Keith A of Hertford - PM
Date: 29 Jan 16 - 10:11 AM

it (Israel) has demanded the closure of the International Criminal Court.

So this is another made up fact Jim!
You claim it but can not substantiate because it is not true.

Been there - done that Keith - yes they have, and are continuing to do so.

Israel denies any and no decent democracy holds the guilty of any such.
Just accusations and propaganda Jim. You are so gullible!

Then where are your arguments - other than "Israel is innocent O.K.?"

No arguments at all.
I just put their side, as you put the opposite side.
How could any fair minded person object to both sides of an argument being put?
What is your objection Jim?

"I chose to respond to your point 5."
You were shot down in flames -

No! You did not challenge a single word."
Ok Jim.
5   In 2015, Israel invaded Gaza, leaving 2,104 Palestinian dead, including 1,462 civilians - 344 children.

Israel was subjected to indiscriminate attacks on its civilians from terrorists hiding among civilians. It was a victim of war crimes.
It had a right and duty to respond, and tried to do so without breaking international law. The civilian deaths were the result of Hamas' war crimes not Israel's.

No decent democratic government believes Israel guilty of any massacre or atrocity.
They know it is all propaganda, but deluded hate filled people like you suck it all up without a question.

Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate
Subject: RE: BS: Terrorism, Again (Israel)
From: Jim Carroll - PM
Date: 28 Jan 16 - 07:16 AM

No excuse of the atrocities done during the invasion the destructuion of occupied hospitals, he unprecedented killing of so many children (according to Ban Ki-Moon) or women and old people.
"No decent democratic government believes Israel guilty of any massacre or atrocity."
Every single human rights group has accused it of these - not interested what self-interested politicians think.
Not done too well so far - no evidence, just denials "Israel didn't do it"
Now how about that rest of number 5?
Jim Carroll

WILL YOU STOP LYING
Now will you piss off - out of shame, if nothing ales
Jim Carroll