The trouble, HiLo, is that you're biased. That's fine. So am I. There comes a time when you have to look at your opponents' viewpoints to see whether they've supported them. I note that you you do not criticise our vacuous Guest's viewpoints, which are generally either unsupported or are supported by Zionist sources only. Jim goes to considerable lengths to support his arguments. It's up to you to pick over his points and links and demolish them if you don't like them. That's what I do with Keith when I can be arsed. I demolished him over his falsehoods with regard to Geoffrey Wheatcroft. It was easy because you can't erase your lies on this website. If you don't agree with Jim it's down to you, if you can be arsed, to pick him apart. You don't do that. You just complain because you don't agree. Not good enough. So there's a challenge for you. Work as hard as Jim and you might get somewhere. Simply whine about name-calling and you just won't. Why not? Because your own mates here do it all the time, you don't bollock them, and we can all see that.