"Mind·made·up·please·do·not·confuse·with·facts" "
As with your friends Mike, you are extremely welcome to challenge any of the facts I have put up - I dearly wish would would.
The fact that you or they have never even attempted to do so is a pretty strong confirmation that they are what I believe them to be - facts.
"Do you mean in 1948 Jim?"
You have denied over and over again that there have ever been massacres "no massacres", "what massacres" - when I put Morris's statement up you said he had been disputed - not another wriggle after so many, surely?
Or maybe you were only defending "three points".
He stated that Israel carried out 27 massacres - that is twenty seven more than "none".
Maybe "behaving well" to some people - not where I was brought up.
You stated that Morris's claims had been disputed - they haven't, you lied.
Odd though that you should be now hiding behind a single statement of a "disputed" historian - or maybe not!!
Expulsion not a war crime - the refusal to allow millions of people to return to their homes following a war goes beyond a war crime and is a crime against humanity.
The most recent expulsions/expansionism/spread of settlements/evictions of Palestinians - Bedouins included, is what makes what is happening ethnic cleansing.
"Not rue Jim.
I said that one of your quotes was faked, and the other probably was."
Do you really want me to dig our all your postings claiming Ben Gurion was "only putting the Arab point of view when he admitted stealing their land" - surely not - remember the not digging when you're in a hole" proverb.   
Your case for the massacres is that Israel carried them out (or "didn't") because they were harbouring fighters - that is supporting killing hostages - if you're not, you should vebe condemning them.
"Give your most incriminating fact."
You've had all the facts, over and over again - but their rrefusal to stand trial and to bring the International crimes court crashing in flames is fairly incriminating - you have yet to address the consequences of that.
"I just pointed out that some means of identifying those entitled to free food was required,"
That is defending something that has been compared to the wearing of yellow stars, was compulsory indoors and out, has brought about racist abuse and has now been exposed for what it is and abandoned - you lied about that as you have here - seems an inbuilt trait.
Jim Carroll