"No. I quoted you verbatim."
You did not Keith - this was your claim
"There is certainly nothing to judtify Jim's claim that this local arrangement represents a government policy to persecute asylum seekers!
- where have I ever suggested that it was Government policy to PERSECUTE ASYLUM SEEKERS
I neither said that, notr do I believe it, as my reply pointed out.
I believe that it was "possibly" a trying out of tagging asylum seekers with a possible view to expanding it to all immigrants, or at least those who have arrived recently.
If you can find one hint of persecution - put it up - don't expect for a minute you are prepared to withdraw it.
You and Ake have made a fine art of rewriting what people say to suit yourselves.
"There may be to this than meets the eye - the Government has been aware of this for four years."
As I said before - not a word of "persecution"
Cameron did describe them as a swarm - are you suggesting he did not?
Again - not a word of "persecution" - you appear to be linking Cameron's words with persecution - not me.
What the **** are you putting something written by Steve up for - I didn't say it - you've already been told about this.
Wriggling - malicious or just plain stupid - or what?
I certainly believe the Government are prepared to use immigrants to will elections - so are many other politicians - that is cynicism, not racism, in my opinion.
Now put up or shut up Keith and stop exposing yourself to more ridicule
Jim Carroll