Who is trying to get it classed as "respectable science?" The same nutters who call themselves creationist scientists?

My first comment you sneered at is impressed on medical students during myth dismissing lectures. My second statement stands as we understand the basis of neural networking if not the results. (Man invented and developed microprocessors but since introducing fuzzy logic could never explain in sequence how the binary leads to what you are staring at right now.)

Telepathy is explained, had been debunked and there is extensive research into utilising suggestion and mind over matter, but the transference of conscious thought? 😹😹😹