"Come on, give us a list of them, Keith."
Sorry to be critical Steve, but you're usually much quicker on the uptake than this - you really don't appear to have grasped Keith's rule-book.
When Israel commits an act of terror you wait to see which politician of which "decent country" (carefully vetted, of course) condemns it as a war crime.
If one does, they cease to be a "decent country" because they have condemned Israel, which makes them "Anti-Semitic".
If the politicians of no (carefully vetted) "decent country" condemns it, no matter what it is, (the massacre of women and children, the facilitating of the mass slaughter of 3.500 unarmd refugees, the use of chemical weapons of fragment missile like flechettes), it can't possibly be described as a war crime.
As Keith doesn't believe in Human Rights organisations such as Amnesty or mercy organisations such as Médecins Sans Frontières, you can't possible take their word that war crimes have been committed - ergo, Israel has never committed a war crime.   
Are you 'fick or what Steve - have you never read 'Catch 22'?
The fact that war crimes and acts of state terrorism are defined by what it is, not by which State's politicians says nothing about it seem to be beyond the comprehension of 'humanists' like Keith.
Wake up there boy!
Jim Carroll