It was a spell check option. (the rest I would call an uncensored dyslexic rant nearly devoid of logic but rich with truthiness)

I do not mean to criticize great religious scholars whose intent is to seek greater compassion and knowledge for mankind and our world.

But when religion abuses science with notions of creation science it is as backwards as science basing our next discovery of space energies upon faith and not the next generation collider in China nearly twice the size of the LGH.

I would criticize science as well when they are not being honest in their project grants or dubious measurement boondoggles. (like the one at the south pole)   
So I agitate, but would never think of censorship. Most opinions are NOT valid as Lord Donald or the 700 club teaches us.

Its up to each of us to determine how much and what kind of BS we will not accept.