From: Jim Carroll - PM
Date: 24 Jun 16 - 12:23 PM

"The bit in bold there is the statement that has been rebutted by Morgan Stanley"
Doublspeak
"Some massive and extremely pessimistic assumptions there "
Nope - they've been discussing placing the borders back in place all day here.
The closure of borders to British firms has been a topic of discussion here all day,
Why should British firms have free passage over foreign countries - it has just removed itself from the only reason it has been able to.
"during which time things will be put in place to the mutual satisfaction of all parties."
Who says and why should countries assist a competitor?
The only reason for this decision to have been pushed through by the wealthy and privileged bit of Little England is the one touted by the Brexits from day one - to get rid of Johnny Foreigner.
I see you fail to commnt on the immediate damage done already - resignation of head of state, threat to peace process, possible break-up of Britain, immediate economic crash, (27 to the tune of 137bn.....
Sneak past the awkward bits, as usual
It's turned out to be a catastrophe on the first day - what can happen in a week, never mind two years?
Jim Carroll

Can somebody please put the above into recognisable and understandable English, so that I can try to put reasoned responses to it?