I am betting there are branches of science that have not yet been defined.

Overall I align myself with Steve and DMcG

The point of departure between me and DMcG would most likely be my acceptance of a concept of consciousness that includes a mind space capable of sharing more than we alone know.

Steve says he is a simple man but that would make me far simpler.
My IQ is well below 100. Dyslexic reading problems have persisted all through my life. I have to rely on tricks to translate and decipher language. There are a multitude of times when I should not know or understand something yet I rely upon a type of innate mind space to see more clearly.

I have to admit this subjective experience may only be a symptom of a work around for dyslexic wiring. Perhaps I am accessing a subconscious more often than most to cope better.

I understand many scientific breakthroughs come to people who have had a dream or mind space experience. I am not including myself as among them but I think I understand their subjective experience.

True enough the hard grinding work of taking measurements for years is the straight forward heavy lifting in science. I suspect it is possible that there may be a tad more regarding our doors of perception.

A conceptual framework of science I imagine and use is one I call Perspectivism. It seems to help with a creative approach to new ideas.

I concede that ideas that seem exciting to me are boring BS to others.
C'est la vie.