"The Labour Party were accused, they responded to those accusations - no evidence was found." - Sez Jom the Infallable

So let's review what subsequently happened shall we:

1: Because no evidence was found by the person asked to carry out this investigation came up with eleven recommendations that required immediate and sustained action - does that strike anyone as being a sign that all was well?

2: Because no evidence was found the person asked to investigate anti-Semitism within the OULC gave a further seven recommendations related to further issues to a separate investigation being conducted by Shami Chakrabarti - does that strike anyone as being a sign that all was well?

3: Labour's National Executive Council for reasons best known to themselves decided not to publish Baroness Royall's Report that according to Jom proves conclusively that no evidence of anti-Semitism was found - rather strange that don't you think? If the report gives the OULC a clean bill of health why not publish it? - Reeks of "cover-up".

4: Naz Shah must be a self-confessed liar - but I don't think she is.