Jim Carroll - 01 Aug 16 - 08:55 AM

"The Labour party party dealt with the criticism and made recommendations - nothing from the Tories yet and nothing from you pair about the fact that Britain has a racist foreign Secretary - you made enough fuss about the Labour problem - doesn't racism and bigotry count if it comes from the right - obviously not."

The thread title is what Carroll?

Has Britain got a "racist" Foreign Secretary? Just because you think it so Jom does not actually make it so thankfully.

"The decision not to publish details of the Oxford enquiry was, as afar as I am concerned, a correct one.
It involved young people in the process of getting an education whose futuers depend on their not being a scandal attached to them in any shape or form - to people like you, being accused is tantamount to their being guilty, as you have amply demonstrated here."

Big fan of Political Party "cover-ups" are you Jom? Particularly if the cover-up is to protect the reputations of the next generation of the Labour Party's "young bloods" who may or may not have been ever so slightly anti-semetic whilst up at Oxford what?

"If there had been a serious problem, I have no doubt that the authorities would have dealt with it - in the light of the publicity this has received they could not afford to do otherwise."

Ah so just because you think that all is well - such astounding faith in the political establishment of the UK for someone whose views normally display such vehement and rabid Anglophobia. It was because of the publicity this matter received and what was contained in the report that Labour's NEC decided that it should not be published.

"If you have any information that the verdict that was reached was inaccurate or rigged, please offer it"

Ehmmmm Jom, what verdict are you wittering on about? There hasn't even been a trial. One thing is blindingly obvious though, after having read Baroness Royall's Report of her Investigation into the Oxford University Labour Club, Labour's National Executive Council decided that it was against the best interests of the Labour Party to have it's contents known by the British public.

"do you really think you are going to walk away from once again accusing me of making things up?"

Who's "walking away" Jom? You most certainly have "made stuff up" you said that during the Great War Lord Kitchener was forced to resign. So c'mon Jim tell us all when that was, give us the date, seeing as how you didn't make it up. Not "walking away" Jom - on the contrary we could open a thread on "Jim Carroll Made-Up-Shit" - the ball is in your court - all you need to prove me wrong is a date - the date Lord Kitchener was forced to resign as Secretary of State for War (Hint: It must be sometime between 5th August, 1914 and the 5th June, 1916.)

"Now - how about a withdrawal and an apology for suggesting that I made up the "self-hating Jews" statement"

And I suggested all this when Jom? Or are you just rambling on aimlessly in your usual incoherent style?