Steve, you said (italics not working again)
"By the way, you alleged that Chakrabarti was promised a peerage in return for a whitewash."

If she was offered a peerage before the report came out, then it is perfectly reasonable to assume it was intended to influence it.

That is why Streeting said it "stinks" and it "undermines" the "remaining credibilty" of her report.

Her interviewer must have known well before about the offer or he would not have raised the issue.
She refused to answer, so she obviously was aware of it too and realised how bad it looked.

Perfectly reasonable my arse. You have failed to produce the evidence that your claim required. Talk about extrapolations and made-up shite. That is a smear. You accuse other people of "smearing" you when the accusations are accurate, then you smear Chakrabarti on completely tenuous grounds. Jesus, you'd have been a great judge for Senator McCarthy, or during the Red Scares. You have about one thousandth of the integrity of Shami Chakrabarti, if that, so it's high time you shut your big gob about her. Next to you, she's a shining star of integrity beside a pile of ordure. Had it been true that she accepted the promise of a peerage in return for producing a whitewash, and that that had been leaked as you claimed, it would have provided the scandal of scandals. But it hasn't. It's produced a few wankers like you and the Tory press trying to make hay, and it's got nowhere. What's your next move? Are you sure that Jeremy doesn't eat babies? This is right up there with your Wheatcroft moment and your spurious claim about the EUMC non-document. You are a disreputable desperado of the worst kind.