"She must have been offered it before the report" - bollocks. Not evidence. That proves absolutely nothing. Thrown out of court. You accused her of taking the peerage IN RETURN FOR A WHITEWASH REPORT.   In return for it, Keith. Prove it. Put up or shut up. And Teribus, dear chap, has it not occurred to you that dignified people routinely refuse to answer insulting and uncalled-for questions? You wouldn't do it and I wouldn't do it. If someone came up to you and said "Hey, Bill, are you a child molester?" Would you dignify the questioner with an answer? I bloody wouldn't. I'd tell him to bugger off in no uncertain terms and so would you. Now if you have solid evidence that she accepted a peerage IN RETURN FOR a whitewash, let's be having it. It is a very serious accusation, and it might not have occurred to you that had there been any truth in it at all it would be the scandal of the year. Instead, it's not even a nine-day wonder, and only that because of the hysterical bleatings of a few pro-Israel bigots who are actually very close to breaking the law by making unfounded and unsupportable accusations against her.