Having accepted the nomination and having (according to you, and big deal anyway) been sworn to secrecy DOES NOT MEAN THAT SHE ACCEPTED THE PEERAGE IN RETURN FOR A WHITEWASH. That is what you accused her of and that is what you can't support with evidence. Refusing to answer an impertinent question is not evidence. Watch the interview, which was carried out by an attack-dog. And don't give me that independent-from-Israel rubbish. Just watch some of their output.