Now let's see. You make an accusation that this woman has accepted a peerage IN RETURN FOR A WHITEWASH. Then you tell us not to be silly because the accusation is unprovable. So why are you making an unprovable accusation? In a court of law that would be thrown out among laughter and derision from judge and jury. The point here is that the accusation did not exist until anti-Labour and (more particularly) pro-Israeli factions made it. The onus is squarely on your shoulders to prove your claim, not on us to disprove what you say. You started it, so let's see you seeing this through. Timelines, coincidences, putting two and two together to make five and character assassinations, not to speak of insinuations about the innate corruptness of the left, are not evidence. The fact that you won't back down on this scurrilous and unsupportable smear against someone whose politics don't suit you speaks volumes about your dishonesty and lack of integrity, qualities that she has in spades but which have evaded you completely.