To prove something has been covered up requires that you show what has been covered up"

Jom old son I don't really think that you have been following this at all have you?

1: Royall Report 11 recommendations + 7 additional suggested recommendations for the Chakrabarti Inquiry that Royall was shut out of (You cannot obviously influence anyone by offering them a peerage if they already have one can you?)

2: Three of the seven suggested additional recommendations are ignored and Chakrabarti's recommendation basically shuts off any further investigation that would delve into the situation that prevailed prior to her report being submitted. So conveniently for Labour's NEC any calls for any investigation that would expose any wrong doing they can sit back and ignore.

Any suggestion why within the extremely short timespan that Shami Chakrabarti was a member of the Labour Party, "The Leader", decided to do a U-turn on his declared decision not to make any nominations to the Lords and reward the new-comer, who just coincidently was investigating abuse within the Labour Party involving "Momentum" with a peerage - his one and only nomination lobbied for as soon as Cameron announced his resignation.

If that set of circumstances were applied to the Conservative Party you would be screaming "cover-up" and "whitewash" from the rooftops. Unfortunately it is the Labour Party that Corbyn has chosen to destroy that are in the firing line and most complaints are coming from within the Party and that Jom is an undeniable fact.