"You keep accusing me of lying but you have yet to identify a single one."
You lie consistently Keith
In the face of masses of evidence you have been given, eye witness accounts, press reports, inquiries, you say no evidence of Israel's culpability in the massacre has been produced
That is a blatant lie.
You have been given a short systemic list of the events of Israel's part in the massacre - you claim to have answered them all - you have answered none
That is a blatant lie.
You distort, you deny facts, you contradict witness statements, you misrepresent facts, you make stupid statements like your "decent nations not condemning..." all to defend mass murder - that is dishonesty to a viral extent.
Typical example.
"You do not need flares to murder people in a crowded camp,"
Sabra Shatila was totally without public lighting - the victims were dragged from their tiny dwellings, the wonen were raped and disemboweled in the lanes, the men were butchered - all in total darkness????
You have to be joking.
That is dishonesty
Where evidence if incontrovertible, you ignore it - that is dishonest.
"Most were killed in their homes"
Do you have any evidence of this
If you don't you are making it up.
"You do need flares to identify enemy positions and fighters in the dark"
No fighters were found and a tiny number of weapons were recovered.
That is a lie.
Your lies are in order to defend an unspeakable massacre of unarmed civilians
That is inhuman.
Jim Carroll