If Ellen Seigal's eye witness statement isn't "evidence" - what is it.
If Robert Fisk's account of the massacre based on his own researches isn't "evidence" what is it.
If the report of the McBride enquiry isn't evidence - what is it?
You said I had not produced evidence - I produced these and much much more
You lied.
You have been given an account of the massacre accepted by all other than the Israeli regime and its supporters - those accounts include people who were there - several Jews included.
You continue to make pathetic claims about how the massacre was carried out and why illumination was necessary for it to continue over three nights.
You have not produced one single account which contradicts those claims other than those made by the Israeli perpetrators and those directly imlpicated as active supporters. - not one - not even from your "decent, democratic nations.
It is all your own work.
"I have it in front of me. It does not implicate Israelis in the massacre"
This massacre could not happened without Israel's active participation under the command of Ariel Sharon, Amos Yaron, and others. Israel prevented terrified residents from leaving, they supplied the flares to the Phalange in order to light up neighborhoods so they could find their victims, they lent a bulldozer to help bury bodies, they were in communication with the murderers, and they could see what was going on in the camps.
Ellen Seigal
You lied
" there was no doubt in my mind that the Israeli Defence Forces officials and soldiers, using sophisticated binoculars, could clearly see what was happening in those camps.
Ellen Seigal
You lied
The Palestinians cannot get a fair hearing in Israel.
You lied
You have not only lied consistently but you have lied stupidly
All these quotes from Ellen Seigal were posted yesterday, each one points the finger directly at Israel, yet you claim "It does not implicate Israelis in the massacre"
Are you totally insane - it would appear so
Jim Carroll