Is it really fair that a child murderer should have food, shelter, clothing, a gym, a doctor, when there are children in the USA, a wealthy country, who have no shelter and no food?
The real scandal is clearer to see if you trim that sentence: Is it really fair that ... there are children in the USA, a wealthy country, who have no shelter and no food?
Maybe in a way the judicial killings are one of the things that divert people's attentions from the sickness that they need to address. Maybe that's what they are really for.