It's all mine!!! :-)

Not only Jim and I assert that it is true but the judge also decreed it. He ruled that the government could not do what they said they would without taking it to the house. The judge in the appeal mat rescind that ruling but no one knows what the outcome of that will be as yet.

I don't understand what the issue is here. Unequivocal - Not ambiguous. Judges make a living out clarifying ambiguity and the judge at the high court said that in his opinion the government did not answer the case satisfactorily. An appeal has been allowed and that may change things.

Can I make a suggestion? Until the appeal is ruled on can we call it a day? I am sure everyone is getting bored with this argument anyway. Maybe continue by PM?

DtG