"Except the documented small arms ammunition"
Documented where?? A news paper?? The Daily Mail eh? Are you serious?"

That was when you were still insisting that the ammunition in question had been delivered and was being used to kill civilians in Homs. Your story in the Homs thread changed as I have stated below from British Weapons sent by the British Government to Assad to finally you stating that all that had happened was that a licence had been issued. You have yet to prove that a single round was ever sent to Syria.

But just for the record and to put things in context here is the full exchange:

Subject: RE: BS: Homs horror
From: Teribus - PM
Date: 20 Mar 12 - 07:06 PM

Ah, so in short, you have no proof at all that the British Government sold anything to the Assad regime in Syria. It was just something you read in a newspaper, and having read the passage you misunderstood it and got it all wrong - something that I bet is not too unusual for you.

Subject: RE: BS: Homs horror
From: Jim Carroll - PM
Date: 21 Mar 12 - 07:14 AM

"WHO HAS SUPPLIED NOTHING TO SYRIA!" Teribus from a previous post
Except the documented small arms ammunition - as you say, sniper bullets
Nothing else new then?

What you are arguing there Jim Carroll is that the ammunition was supplied by the British Government and sent to Syria and that Carroll is a barefaced lie. One that you were pulled up on.

Still waiting for the post of mine where I deny that any export licence was ever granted.

Thanks Steve, I'll try harder next time.