The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #148447   Message #3826913
Posted By: Jim Carroll
16-Dec-16 - 12:47 PM
Thread Name: BS: Syria: the new nightmare?
Subject: RE: BS: Syria: the new nightmare?
I started from the bottom of the thread (more convenient
Your first reaction was to deny the licence had been issued - which you returned to aon the last posting "Ah, so in short, you have no proof at all that the British Government sold anything to the Assad regime in Syria. It was just something you read in a newspaper, and having read the passage you misunderstood it and got it all wrong - something that I bet is not too unusual for you.
And again:
NO PROOF WHATSOEVER THAT BULLETS REPORTEDLY SOLD SUBJECT TO A BRITISH EXPORT LICENCE WERE EVER DELIVERED
Having denied the licence, you said they were never delivered, you then invented a private dealer (no proof provided) The licence issued to a private arms dealer in 2009 to sell small arms ammunition (or small arms "arms", as you prefer it) was revoked in good time and there is no evidence that ANY ammunition was ever delivered at all.
No proof of next - doesn't mention ammo , so not sure whether you are talking about no licence, a revoked licence, no delivery, a private buyer   putting up a smokescreen - as you often do
hat the 154 export licences issued by the British Government for anything being exported to Syria were all revoked in line with EU rules
Now - do we have a licence - do we have a private buyer or is your denial that there is no proof of a licence the one you are sticking with?
This is from a handful of your last postings on thes subject - it gets murkier as it goes on - only four contradictions so far.
Havent got to "the shipment was delivered far too early to make a difference" or they were the wrog size (no mention on the size of ammunition in the newspaper information (which you have dismissed as lies)
By then, you had appeared to have accepted that a delivery was made, but to a rivate buyer and the ammo sent was useless.
Any chance of providing an encrypted guide to your arguments - it was impenitrable then, and it is no clearer now?
For fucks sake - the statements you have just put up contradict yourself - and I haven't started on the rest of them yet.
Dig away!!
Jim Carroll