The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #161452 Message #3836753
Posted By: Keith A of Hertford
04-Feb-17 - 02:38 PM
Thread Name: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
Can you prove that each of those organisations called the report "reputable?"
The media organisations reported the CST report without expressing any reservations or misgivings about the CST.
If they did not consider it reputable, they would report criticisms of it. None did.
BBC, "The CST, which works with police to gather data, said recorded incidents last had increased by 36% on 2015."
The police would not work with an organisation they did not believe to be reputable.
And, that is the source if the stats. that you question.
Can you prove that I'm the only person in the world who agrees with Jenny Tonge?
Not provable. There might be some other nut somewhere, but I can't find one. Can you?
So you agree with their conclusions - do I have that right?
Not qualified Jim, but they are a reputable group so they should not be dismissed.
If so, what is his motivation?"
For Christs sake Keith - I've just given it for the third time
You mean his allegiance to Israel? That is why he lies against Labour?
Where is your evidence that evidence exists?
I have shown, with quotes, that the leadership acknowledges the fact.
"It was the reputable CST report that concluded that Labour's anti-Semitism probably contributed to the rise in such attacks."
No. That is the truth.