Rag,
I quoted you verbatim.

No. You partially quoted, leaving out the bits that explained what I actually meant.

Steve,
refused to admit that he ascribed a comment to a person who did not make that comment.

I declared the passage with his actual comments IN FULL. I gave both words used to rubbish those texts.
Referring to it later I conflated the two, BECAUSE THE FULL DISMISSAL HAD ALREADY BEEN GIVEN.
There was no deception and no need for deception because the article supported my case and dismissed yours.

But why are we here?
If you could challenge what I put in this thread you would.
Instead Steve goes back to 2014, Jim and Rag to 2011 in the desperate search for something to use against me personally.
And still you fail to find anything!

You sad, obsessive men.
If you can't argue the thread, leave it or talk flowers.