The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #161452   Message #3841906
Posted By: Keith A of Hertford
27-Feb-17 - 08:26 AM
Thread Name: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
Jim,
"I actually do not think they were all paedophiles or perverts."
Then why did you describe them so and why do you insist that they are by pretending to claim other have sai so


I did not. If you are not lying produce a quote.

No - you quoted a tiny handful who said there might be cultural implications but they didn't know what the reason was for the criminality

They all blamed various aspects of culture as the reason.

It says there is some (not massive) in Oxford and it says that if it is cultural it is not "Muslim" but from the surrounding circumstances - it goes on to outline those circumstances - nothing to do with being "Muslim"

I said many times in the old thread that it was "nothing to do with being Muslim."

The Indy says it was to do with culture, and acknowledged the over-representation.

You specified Muslim Pakistanis - every last one of them - those who weren't rapists have to suppress their culture

The cause was said to be cultural, and we are all implanted to some extent by our culture.

I only said I believed it, and only because of all those credible people, and stating that only a tiny minority were effected.
Read the thread and stop lying about it.

Rag,

It seems strange to me that some posters are more than happy to have accusations aimed specifically at Pakistani Muslim men but are not prepared to even engage when their own religion and it's culture is shown to exhibit tendencies to abuse young children.


I believe that all demographics "exhibit tendencies to abuse young children."
It hardly needs saying that includes whites and Christians.
What moron would be unaware of cases involving those groups!