Well, you see, Teribus, Andrew Neil and you (who are in total agreement) appear to have jumped the gun. The killer was not on intelligence radar and there is no evidence that he was radicalised in prison. The idea that he was some kind of Islamic jihadist has basically bitten the dust. Seems to me that he was a demented and frustrated loner and that the atrocity was a one-off tragedy brought about by a man who had lost his mind. So easy to jump to premature conclusions, eh?