"there are things we discuss ad nauseam and round and round and round we go." - Shaw

Yes that does seem to be the norm, primarily due to the likes of Carroll and yourself when your contentions are being successfully countered you resort to rehashing old arguments from previous threads(2014 in your case and 2012 & 2011 in the case of Carroll). Thank God you were caught lying through your teeth on the matter that you accused another 'catter of doing exactly the same thing, so instead of dredging up old threads now you branch out to waste space with inanities. Still serves as a very good indication that you have run out of steam or substance on whatever the thread was about.