Greg F: Long before the election warnings were issued about the security of electronic voting.Yet to save money paper votes were not insisted upon. Irregardless of perceived irregularities in the electronic vote, if it was felt by some to be susceptible then why did the process continue. Seems more than dumb to me. Or perhaps it was to give grounds for disputing the outcome should the vote have gone awry(as it did)
If the mainstream media was spread among multiple ownership perhaps the content could be given a higher level of trust. But what we have is continued sniping trying to built castles of air created from supposition, rumour and hearsay. In essence stories are circulated with zero tangible evidence shown to give any shred of support. No wonder religions can garnish so much support. Control the media, feed a line continuously and you control the people. Easy peasy!
Never in the field of bullshit has so much been achieved by so few to control so many.