Fine by me
If you are not prepared to put up your alternative facts we have no grounds of conversion
" ill-conceived world view"
Unqualified dismissal of arguments such as this is usually the response
I suggest you look at the reality of how the world is not sharply divided into haves and have-nots and then count reality of the number of haves occupying prison cells - that should do the trick

I'll try that again, a line at a time:
If you are not prepared to put up your alternative facts we have no grounds of conversion
I'm guessing you mean 'conversation' not 'conversion'. But with your normal posts it is difficult to tell. I do not put up alternative facts because:
a. Some people would equate the term "alternative facts" with "fake news".
b. I can't give alternative facts to the post I responded to as it contained no facts, merely broad-brush strokes of your view of how the world is.
Unqualified dismissal of arguments such as this is usually the response
Again, no argument was put forward to be dismissed.
I suggest you look at the reality of how the world is not sharply divided into haves and have-nots and then count reality of the number of haves occupying prison cells
If there is, as you claim, no sharp delineation between haves and have-nots, why do you then try to use that delineation in your comments?