""Folk police personified."
Once again it was not addressed to you Vic - it was not attributed to anybody but wsas copied directly from Raggy's posting above
I did not "falsely" accuse you of anything last time, I mistakenly did so and apologised
"Are you ready to offer another apology?"
If you insist, but I would have thought an explanation would have done, given the circumstances
Sorry
"If you now consider you shouldn't have made the remark perhaps you should withdraw it "
I don't understand your point
Iaian said that those holding left wing views should not be considered as telling the truth
He later went on to say that anybody who didn't share his tastes were stupid
What is there to apologise for - I certainly have no intention of withdrawing my remark?
I find it interesting that you should defend such behaviour and go on to say "There is only one way and that's the Jim Carroll way"
That is patently not true, as is your implied accusations of my lying ""I wonder if you ever actually enjoy folk music"
I have stated over and over again that I do enjoy folk song, as a singer and as a listener - so I am not telling the truth - according to you
Who should apologise to whom Raggy?
No forget that
The amount of mud-slinging that has gone of here from all sides has created a situation that nobody should either demand or expect an apology
You are as guilty as abybody
Let's see if we can't move on without the abuse eh?
Jim Caarroll