Dave, I said, "Every post of yours puts you firmly on the anti-Green side,"

That is what I think.
Am I wrong, or not. Just tell us!

Steve,
The people defending him here are arch-Tories to a man,

He does not need defending because nothing has been produced to condemn him.
Not one thing.

Also, I for one am not any kind of Tory.
I used to vote Labour in the Blair days as I have told you many times before.

Backwoodsman,
This bellowed comment from the guy who has studiously ignored four questions which I've asked him directly not once, but twice!

When you claimed that before I pointed out that I had answered and repeated my answer.
If I really have missed something, put it up now and I will respond.

It will be a networked computer. There will be an audit-trail which will carry evidence of the person whose account was logged-in at the time the material was downloaded. Are you claiming that this audit-trail doesn't exist? Where is your evidence?

You are asking me for evidence of no evidence! No-one has produced this audit trail and Green would be a fool to deny it if there was a chance of it being produced.

Also, we know porn appeared on at least one other parliamentary computer without the users' knowledge.

Where is your evidence of this simply being a matter of them holding a 'grudge'? Do you know the gentlemen personally? Have you discussed their views with them?

Their careers were blighted by the furore due to their actions. Who would not bear a grudge?