Dave,
None of your business.

Not just me. I am sure everyone is now intrigued to know your views on the thread subject.
Everyone else has expressed theirs, but dear little Dave is much too coy.
19 posts to the thread without actually expressing an opinion!
What are you like Dave?

Steve,
The claims that he used, if not also downloaded, porn on his work computer are not unsubstantiated. It was his computer. The porn was on it. That is substance

It is unsubstantiated that there was any porn at all.
If there was, it is unsubstantiated how it got there.
No substance whatsoever.

If I found porn on my computer I'd be racking my brain as to who...

He did not find it. The policeman claimed to have found it, but ten years too late for anyone to check.

But he's apparently just sat on this for nine years

No. The policeman did. You are back to making shit up again!

He needs to tell us how he investigated and dealt with the miscreant, if that's what he did.

He had no way of knowing there even was one, if indeed there was.
It is all entirely unsubstantiated by any scrap of hard evidence.

We do not do Stalinist show trials here yet.

He now has another sex allegation pending

No another. Just the one, and that is being properly and fully investigated.