Green hasn't committed a criminal offence by downloading and using pornography. He probably hasn't committed a criminal offence by touching a young woman's knee. It does seem to me that the policeman in question saw the second allegation, had in his possession information that he probably wasn't entitled to make public, but saw Green trying to call others liars for dissing him when it was clear to the policeman that the chap is quite possibly anything other than squeaky clean. It's no use trying to pretend that the porn wasn't there, Keith. The questions being asked of Green are whether he knew that the porn was there, whether he knew who downloaded it, if it wasn't him then what did he do to find out who did do it, and whether he used that porn in work time. I'll add one more question to those: why isn't he suing the policeman for defamation?