Jim,
What evidence do you have that the two policemen who claimed to have seen the porn were lying

I have none but without any evidence to corroborate the claims, the fact that they were not made until 9 years later and the fact of the 9 year feud would allow a defence to claim they were unreliable witnesses.

Even if true there is still no crime and it is impossible to prove he was responsible anyway.

It makes a very flimsy case for taking someone's job. Why are you people so determined to condemn a man on so little evidence? It is just politics to you.