Jim,
The porn was reported at the time - nothing was done about it

You just made that up. It was not reported at the time.

What are you so determined to defend a government minister

I am not. I just point out to those who assume he is guilty just because of who he is that there is no actual evidence against him except the unsubstantiated claims of two unreliable witnesses nine years after the event.

Why are you so ready to condemn him without proper evidence? Rhetorical question - because he is a Tory Minister, of course

You've condemned Labour politicians as being misogynist bullies and anti-semites on far less evidence than this.

I have not. Those were all current accusations with corroborating hard evidence.

Mr.Red,
But the police have nothing to prove his guilt.

They did at the time, it is said.
Maybe the gov of the time decided that it was not a sufficiently serious issue to preserve the reports thereto.

It was a police investigation.

Dave, as I said there are two posts where you refer to Green's use of porn as if it were a fact, ignoring his denials and the absence of any hard evidence.
You also repeatedly and only attacked anyone who put Green's case but never criticised any of the anti-Green group even when they resorted to blatant lies against Green.
That was more than sufficient for me to know you are anti-Green, and I am right aren't I?
I will put the two posts in a pm to you.