" it has been widely reported that the ex-cops would be in breach of the rules for revealing information, and may be prosecuted for it."
Not because the information was wrong, just that they shouldn't have made it public, which was exactly my point
THe roke the rules by exposing what a leading member of the establishment was up to.
They were whistleblowers - whistlblowers always run the risk of persecution when they tell things that are uncomfortable to the powers that be
Your accusations of lying against the two policemen are totally unsubstantiated - you are the only one to have described on of them as "untrustworthy"   
Your an establishment arse-kisser Keith
What's your point here?
If you can accuse two policemen without proof, why can't we assume that a minister from a culture of porn-users has a stack of the stuff piled up on his computer = especially as he has also been accused separately by a fellow Tory of being a sexual predator?
Sounds like a dirty old man to me
Jim Carroll