You accuse me of typing made up shit, etc, then you negate that in your own post! In other parts of this thread we've had Iains calling for them to be slung into jail and we've had constant accusations of their bearing a grudge (an accusation, without knowing the characters of the men, that you can't support: it's perfectly possible for mature adults to feel that they've been wronged or dissed without turning it into a grudge) and, by constantly claiming that there's no evidence for the porn, you're implying that they are lying. And the word "discredited" has been thrown around repeatedly, though you can't explain who did the discrediting, bar you and Iains. One little point that I should reiterate: the policeman's nine-year-long knowledge of the porn was not made public until four days after the allegations from the Tory party female worker came out. That sounds to me like the cop wanting to add weight to her allegations. In other words, he may have thought he was acting in the public interest. He certainly was never going to make a fortune from the Mail printing "his story." I would never claim that he wasn't out of order technically in making it public. But, to coin a cliche, we are where we are. And where we are is that Green has a lot of explaining to do, protective establishment attack-dogs notwithstanding. His integrity is severely in doubt whether you like it or not.