"it is reasonable to ask why."
Because this particular suspect is a member of an official body who are in a position to change the laws on a business that degrades women and puts them at risk to sexual attacks - he has been accused both of using pornography and harassment
If you are aware that his case is one "among many" why do you refuse to condemn the "many" and why do you attempt to brush off an accusation of sexual harassment as unimportant?
Rhetorical questions, of course - because they involve one of 'the great and the good' in a party you support
Your arguments have never been anything other than part of a political agenda, certainly nothing to do with justice.
You are happy to accuse two of his accusers as 'discredited' only on the word of your own flavour-of-the-month (one of the two hasn't been mentioned elsewhere as being unreliable)
Where is the justice in that?
Jim Carroll