Jim,
"he should have been suspended while the enquiry proceeded."
As should Green - no word of condemnation on that one though

I meant Green Jim.

PFR,
You can just honestly admit you backed the wrong man and party,

I did not back him.
I did not say he was telling the truth or that the ex-cop lied.
I just objected to you people assuming his guilt without any evidence.
It was just a prejudiced witch hunt.

your dogged blinkered support

That is just made up shit. I did not support him at all except to point out the absence of any evidence of his guilt, apart from the evidence Steve and Jim made up.


You can take a more honourable path of backing down and eating humble pie...

Willingly. Just provide a quote of me saying something that has been proved wrong.
You will not find one.

My, and several other's, main concern has been Green'e persistent blatant lying,

How did you know he was lying before he was sacked?
There was no evidence. You just assumed it out of prejudice.
I kept an open mind.

Rag,
Anyone making such an allegation would be a fool to do so if they did not have conclusive, incontrovertible evidence to back up that claim.
As a ex police officer Bob Quick is probably more aware of this than most people.

He had been caught lying about the Tories before and had to withdraw and make a grovelling apology to them, so not that aware.