"Guilty? There is no crime involved here."
As a Government minister he was guilty of betraying the responsibility of his office by using material that degrades half the population of Britain and presents them as available sex objects for sale
You may not see that as culpable
Wonder how you'd react to a sex tablue like 'Bonkin' Round Bethlehem' or 'Gropin' at Gethsemane' or 'Shaggin' at The Last Supper'
This material degrades women and makes the world a very dangerous place for them - yet you defend the behaviour of these people both as users and possible predators because "they have committed no crimes" and prefer to condemn the whistleblowers who expose them for what they are doing.
"He says it is exaggerated, and it only amounts to mild flirtation anyway."
His word before the victim's to the very last - see what I mean?
You are, as are many of your claimed philosophy, a hypocrite of the first order
nd Ian continues his personal abuse without a single reference to the topi
What a pair
Bring back Teribus, at least he brought a degree of effort to abusive bullshitting
Jim Carroll