The most salient fact is that the organisation that produced the quoted figures is ALMOST certain. Almost = not quite = not sure.

Predicating an argument based on uncertainty rather negates it's validity. Perhaps they are being whimsical or more likely, as others here,they are full of sh*t,

I wonder if their conjectures are based on Heisenberg's uncertainty principle or more likely a thwarted effort to locate the scarlet pimpernel.