"No such evidence has become public."
The accusation has been made by a fellow Tory - there is no reason to believe a lying porn user such as Green rather than a Tory activist
"I just expect evidence before assuming guilt."
Just as you expected the same evidence about the policemen you accused of being "tainted" before Green confessed that he was lying and they were actually telling the truth, do you mean?
He denies it, and there is no evidence for it except the claims, ten years later, of ex-cops with a grudge.
"It is an independent Civil Service enquiry."
There is no guarantee on any such thing - certainly not now
The British Justice system is probably best summed up by one of its most common phrases "you get the best defence money can buy"
Green's accuser, should she take the matter to court, will need to prepare herself for the same ordeal a rape victim is forced to undergo
She will be accused of offering sex for career favours and her own sexual history will be put on display for th world to view - that is why sex crimes and harassment are left unreported in the numbers they are.
Unless she is a very principled individual prepared to make sacrifices, she is likely to settle out of court, (at best) or more likely, forget the matter altogether and we will have to put up with the likes of Green who make the laws and decide the direction this country takes
There is a bit of a revolution going on at present regarding the abuse of power for sexual gains - it started with the exposure of the extent of clerical abuses, moved on to Savile's crimes, and is now reaching into many corners of the great and the good
Green is just a small part of what is happening - watch this space, plenty more to come yet.
Jim Carroll