But you have never done that, Nigel. When there are multiple ways of interpreting statistics as there always is you simply interpret them in a different way to some others and then claim that your interpretation is the right one. It isn't, it is one of many.
What, 'never'? You've read every one of my posts, and can assure me of that?
There are not 'always' multiple ways of interpreting statistics. And even if people try to twist them different ways some interpretations can be more accurate than others (at times), particularly if some are being deliberately misused.