Thank you for that acknowledgement, Keith.

One problem with your trial analogy. The jury would comprise of 12 good men and true. They are given 'the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth'. They are advised by a learned judge on any points that may be unclear.

This did not happen with the referendum. There were a sight more than 12 men. We have no idea how many of those were good and true. They were fed a diet of lies. They were 'advised' by politicians with hidden agendas.

No comparison at all really.

DtG