"There is a major distinction between being rude and deliberately offensive"
You have always managed both, especially when you run out of answers
Want a typical example of your own - now how far do I need go back - how about " mudrats,", or "jimmie is deliberately offensive" (previous posting)
I choose to post under my own name unlike anonymous and somewhat cowardly trolls like yourself
That was your last posting - the one before was
"Little jimmie is the most offensive and you shaw are the most insulting."
Then the one before that
"You are a disgrace to this forum."
And before that
"Carroll comes out to play with zero consequences"
And before that
"and of course jimmies introduction of his usual Jewish card made no contribution?"
And before that
"More of the scouser's fairy tales!"

A clear unbroken run of your last postings - every single on a personal insult
I argue strongly on matters that concern me - I am never gratuitously insulting and I always respond directly to arguments
At no time have I ever replaced argument with insult, as you have from your entry on to this forum.
I once got tired of your and Teribus's use of bullyyiing and insulting tactics (shortly after Joe Offer asked us to desist from childish name calling)
I desisted, Teribus persisted and ten you joined him - he had the edge over you as he was infinitely better at it (strangely, I miss his offensive behaviour).
There is something not a little amusing about somebody as permanently offensive and insulting as you who behaves as schoolyard name-callingly and childish as you do complaining about being insulted
Try Burns, he had the answer:

"O wad some Power the giftie gie us
To see oursels as ithers see us!"

Are you serious Iains?
Jim Carroll