I still think you're missing my point, Steve, which is that hungry children are not to blame for their own family's poverty - they are the innocent victims, whatever and whoever the cause of that poverty - and it is immoral and vindictive in the extreme to deny them sustenance on the basis of, "Their parents don't care enough to provide for them, why should the taxpayer?".

Which, of course is precisely the POV taken by Bozo in his above post.