The credibility of the witness who said she saw a threesome is questionable, and is at odds with one of the accused comments,yet the judge directs the jury in a particular way, questionable.
does it not occur to any of you that the witness who BRIEFLY SAW what she THOUGHT was a CONSENSUAL threesome could have been mistaken, how long did she watch?was the complainant aware of the other womans presence watching? yet the judge indictes to the jury the importance of this witness, despite it being at odds to one of the accused rugby plers version.
no, this trial was conducted by the judge imo in a poor way