Well Jim if you restricted yourself to facts or a discussion of facts there would be no problem. But you insist on wild allegations and total untruths to enforce your point of view, and you do it constantly.
Just in your last couple of posts you amply demonstrate your embellishments.
You denied the quote on Collins.
It ia a matter of public record what was said.
You state there had been no famine is western europe for centuries.
Famines (including Europe) You even overlook the famine in Ireland in 1925.
https://ansionnachfionn.com/2014/10/28/the-irish-famine-of-1925/
"his crowd gave us the Depression and later appeasement to the Nazis and World War Two"
As I pointed out Lloyd george was a liberal. That party was not in charge during the depression or the years leading up to WW2
"Actualy, Lloyd George's silvery (as in eel) tongue gave us nearly a century of bloodshed in the Northern Irish counties by forcing through a Treaty at gunpoint"
The eventual treaty was a compromise, just like most political settlements. Also the final form of it was far ahead of what was proposed originally. As I previously said it is a complex subject and certainly does not lend itself to one sentence summaries.

You study your previous postings on any subject and it is the same woeful litany of constant exaggeration. Why are you so surprised some take issue with this fact. If you did not present your highly biased opinions as facts there would be no argument. You constantly say you have an interest in these subjects, with the implication you have studied them?